Protecting power

A protecting power is a state which somehow protects another state, and/or represents the interests of the protected state's citizens in a third state.

In diplomatic usage, "protecting power" refers to a relationship that may occur when two sovereign states do not have diplomatic relations. Either country may request a third party (with which both do have diplomatic relations) to act as the protecting power, using its "good offices".[1] In the territory of the host country, the protecting power will be recognized by that state as empowered to represent the other and protect its interests. This may extend to caring for the diplomatic property of its protectee or acting as consular officers on behalf of its citizens. The relationship and the legal status are recognized in international conventions on diplomatic and consular affairs, such as the Vienna Conventions.

Contents

Diplomacy

The practice is used when two countries have severed or suspended formal diplomatic ties for whatever reason (or never had them), including military or territorial disputes, and yet wish to retain some form of communication or means of conducting necessary business. Effectively, it is a means of maintaining diplomatic relations when those ties have been formally severed. It is not uncommon for the protected power to retain the use of its former diplomatic representation's buildings (although "attached" to or recognized as a section of the embassy of the protecting power), and to post diplomats to the host state (again, as members of the protected power's "Interests Section" of the protecting power's diplomatic mission). The host may impose much more substantial restrictions on the protected power's ability to post personnel or in other areas, however, than would be customary under normal diplomatic relations.

There is no requirement that the protecting power be of any particular size or that it maintain formal neutrality, but rather that the protecting power have diplomatic relations with both states. The host must grant or accept the assumption of protection. The specific responsibilities and arrangements are agreed between the protecting power and the protected power.

In practice, the "protected power" may be able to carry on quite substantial diplomatic and other relations with the host, despite the lack of formal relations. For example, Cuba and the United States do not have formal diplomatic relations, but both maintain substantial diplomatic presences in each others' countries. Switzerland is the protecting power for the United States in Cuba, and for Cuba in the United States (note that Cuba has separate diplomatic representation in New York at its Permanent Mission to the United Nations). Formally, the U.S. representation in Cuba is known as the United States Interests Section in Havana of the Swiss Embassy to Cuba; in practice, it is staffed primarily by U.S. diplomats and government personnel, and effectively occupies the physical buildings of the (former) U.S. Embassy. Other cases where a protecting power relationship exists include Israel and Taiwan in certain countries where they are not recognized.

Switzerland

Switzerland has a long history serving as a protecting power in many conflicts. During the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871 it represented the interests of the Kingdom of Bavaria and the Grand Duchy of Baden in France. In the First World War, Spain took on more protecting power representational duties than Switzerland, and the Netherlands also took carriage of some mandates.

However in World War II both Axis-leaning Spain and the Nazi-occupied Netherlands were effectively unable to serve as a protecting power, and instead Switzerland took on the role of representing a number of belligerent states. At one point Switzerland represented the interests of 35 states in their enemies' capitals, including the Allies in Axis capitals and the Axis in Allied capitals simultaneously, totaling around 200 mandates. The Swiss were able to cover various issues between the warring states, including the repatriation of prisoners of war, the welfare of Rudolf Hess after his arrival in Scotland and notification of Japan's acceptance of unconditional surrender.[2]

Since the Second World War, Switzerland has been given over 67 protecting power mandates during several conflicts, including the Congo Crisis, the Suez Crisis, the Falklands War and the Kosovo conflict. In Havana, Switzerland represented the interests of eleven Latin - and North American states after the Cuban revolution led these states to withdraw diplomatic relations (since restored in most cases), and Switzerland was instrumental in resolving disputes involving hijackings and refugees between Cuba and the United States. Following the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Switzerland took on additional mandates in the Middle East, and had at one time 25 assignments, the greatest number since 1945. Switzerland provided protecting power representation between India and Pakistan until the two states formalised diplomatic relations in 1976, and supervised the movement of over 320,000 refugees between these countries.[3]

Switzerland now only has six protecting power mandates:

Other protecting power relationships

Certain countries may have agreements to provide limited consular services to the citizens of other countries. This does not necessarily constitute a protecting power relationship, as the host country may not have formally agreed, and there may in fact be diplomatic relations between the host country and the third country, but no physical representation. Without the agreement of the host country, consular officials in this role may not be recognized as representing the interests of another, and be limited to a "good offices" role.

Other meanings

References

  1. ^ Article 12(1) of Geneva Convention IV 1949
  2. ^ Probst, R. (1989). "Good Offices" in the Light of Swiss International Practice and Experience. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-0792301417
  3. ^ Fischer, T. (2002). Switzerland's good offices: a changing concept, 1945-2002 (PDF). Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Forschungsstelle für Internationale Beziehungen.
  4. ^ Iran Foreign Entry Requirements, A Briggs
  5. ^ Georgian Foreign Minister Receives Head Of Swiss FDFA, UNOMIG, January 13, 2009
  6. ^ Website of the Russian Federation's Interests Section of the Embassy of Switzerland in Georgia
  7. ^ Website of Georgia's Interests Section of the Embassy of Switzerland to the Russian Federation
  8. ^ http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/03/20/turkey.us.libya/
  9. ^ Loislaw Federal District Court
  10. ^ Africa Research Bureau. (1984). Africa Research Bulletin. Africa Research. p. 7228
  11. ^ DFAIT http://www.voyage.gc.ca/main/foreign/can_offices_desc-en.asp
  12. ^ Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Europa
  13. ^ "From Geneva to Sri Lanka". International Relations and Security Network. ReliefWeb. 12 August 2009. http://www2.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/eacea085bacc7974c1256ec40042c62b/e185c37b35eabbd8c1257610004015c3?OpenDocument. Retrieved 2010-09-14. "The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which is the official protecting power of the Geneva Conventions, has just put forward guidance on what it means to take part in hostilities, according to their understanding." 

External links